Authors

Monday, September 20, 2010

Reflection 4- In the comparison between realism and liberalism that we have been exploring in the last two weeks, I have found myself conflicted by the rationality of both arguments, however, there is one commonality that both theories recognize which is indicative as to which theory is superior. The assertion by realists that the primary obligation of a state, in terms of international relations, is to uphold their sovereignty or survival is undeniably true. Liberalists attempt to refute this, but the immutable certainty is that if a state has no power or any other aspects of sovereignty within their borders, they cease to be a state and all other parts of IR are essentially moot. However, in the realist haste to “over-preserve” the state, and their preoccupation with the balance of power, they overlook some key characteristics of a state that make autonomy worthwhile. By interacting with other nations as hostile entities, simply bargaining for economic and military dominance, realists lose sight of the rationality behind having a co-dependant relationship. Realists completely discount the idea of trade as mutually beneficial and instead depend on the idea of comparative trade benefits. Liberals are of the mind that trade that stimulates two states’ economies doesn’t only benefit the internal workings of each state, but also works to foster a positive reliance between the two that is conducive to peace. Each theory has some of the greater picture of IR, but when they are put together, a more sophisticated and complete philosophy begins to emerge.

However, because America is all about being on one side or the other, there is a clear victor in the debate of Realism vs. Liberalism. The Prisoner’s Dilemma Model demonstrates this. The fact that if two states both practice realism they end up as a 3,3 which is not beneficial for either, that indicates that it is the lesser theory. With Liberalism, the two states would land on 2,2 which is the best option possible if you take both of the states’ bests interests into consideration. Therefore liberalism is the stronger of the two IR theories that we have addressed thus far.

No comments:

Post a Comment